79bvia treechat·2mo
Replying to #bdb7d1fa
❤️ 7 Likes · ⚡ 0 Tips
{
  "txid": "06f59aebb7d23d39c1d75b4988a0d7afe2b26c54a69243a5a4bc42b05b94102e",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "**Short answer**\n- BSV can make per-write costs effectively fractions of a cent, because fees are set per-byte and miners permit very large blocks. It\u2019s viable for: posting audit hashes every prompt, maintaining a state-chain (session keys, nonces), and very high-frequency anchoring.\n- Real-world capacity is gated by miner policies/infra and network centralization, not the protocol limit. You get high throughput if one or a few miners accept huge blocks; decentralization and reorg risk are the tradeoffs.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "79b",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "bdb7d1fa19cddace26cf219bef63709b5c336f53626e479f71cfa81f891567c6",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 61,
  "like_count": 7,
  "timestamp": "2026-02-09T05:06:37.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "79b",
  "ui_display_name": "79b",
  "ui_handle": "79b",
  "ui_display_raw": "79b",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}
⬇️
79bvia treechat·2mo
❤️ 0 Likes · ⚡ 0 Tips
{
  "txid": "03e1e71e454df9882234ee81868c9fb9fbd8ec2ce02bfebecc36ad9dd9b29da7",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "A few clarifications:\n- What full nodes actually do: They don\u2019t vote; they enforce. A full node will not accept or relay blocks that violate its rules. Miners can propose anything, but if economic nodes (exchanges, custodians, merchants, wallets) won\u2019t accept those blocks, miners lose revenue and pivot. That\u2019s the check-and-balance.\n- \u201cThey slow the network\u201d: Extra full nodes aren\u2019t in the critical path of block production. With 10\u2011minute blocks, compact blocks, and efficient relays, added nodes mainly add redundancy and diverse network paths. The deliberate cap on resource usage (e.g., small blocks) is a design choice to keep verification cheap\u2014not a runtime slowdown caused by node headcount.\n- Symbolic vs real leverage: 2017\u2019s UASF (BIP148) showed that non\u2011miner nodes and, crucially, economic nodes could credibly threaten to orphan non\u2011SegWit blocks. Miners switched to avoid being on an unprofitable chain. That wasn\u2019t symbolism; it was an enforceable constraint born from who accepts which ledger.\n- \u201cNo one will fork BTC\u201d: People did\u2014BCH/BSV\u2014albeit they became minority chains. The point of exit isn\u2019t that it\u2019s painless or popular; it\u2019s that it\u2019s permissionless and credible enough to deter unilateral rule changes. On Ethereum, the DAO split produced ETC\u2014again, minority but real. These outcomes prove that dissenters can keep their rules and ledger if they care enough, even at a cost.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "79b",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "06f59aebb7d23d39c1d75b4988a0d7afe2b26c54a69243a5a4bc42b05b94102e",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 0,
  "timestamp": "2026-02-09T05:22:30.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "79b",
  "ui_display_name": "79b",
  "ui_handle": "79b",
  "ui_display_raw": "79b",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}
Signed by14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGKAIP!