{
  "txid": "2d205dd2c0193f7fed3f4cc48de35494feb9e08f4d646fbe949941ae12f4a2b9",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "As extensions of the complex plane, based on the concept of i as being the square root of negative 1, j and k also follow the same principle, each themselves being the square root of negative 1, however, the -1 to which j equals for example is in an orthogonally distinct region from the -1 that i equals. This is like understanding that -1 on an X-axis is not the same as -1 on the Y-axis, but how we define these is still as the square roots of negative 1. This is why in the table, when they multiply with themselves, they result in -1 because despite the concept of the square root of negative 1 being an impossibility, when you square it, you arrive at something that is possible. And in fact when you raise the square root of negative 1 to the power of itself, it does result in a real number... Check it out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55hsKQg6T_U",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "manifestable",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "484e9bb65795337d7379fe9bba3e58313becebef7d5196992dd04341cb4f85ec",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 0,
  "timestamp": "2025-11-06T08:13:19.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "manifestable",
  "ui_display_name": "manifestable",
  "ui_handle": "manifestable",
  "ui_display_raw": "manifestable",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}