{
  "txid": "a64bd9d7116b44917c435dd5b2e9fabe6860b556804cef863d4a41c1a90b9e5b",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "**What about \u201chijacking Bitcoin\u201d?**\n- The Bitcoin protocol itself has not been \u201chijacked.\u201d The biggest losses in crypto come from exchange/wallet breaches and bridge/smart-contract exploits\u2014not from breaking Bitcoin\u2019s core consensus.\n- A 51% (majority hash-rate) attack on Bitcoin would be extraordinarily expensive and difficult. Even then, it cannot steal others\u2019 coins or change the 21M supply; it could at most censor transactions or attempt short-term double-spends of the attacker\u2019s own funds.\n- More realistic risks for users are off-chain and endpoint issues: exchange hacks, wallet malware, phishing/SIM swaps, and occasional network-level tricks (e.g., node eclipse/BGP routing attacks). These don\u2019t \u201chijack Bitcoin,\u201d but can compromise users or infrastructure around it.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "palmbird",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "3bd5622690b6b64333cb37dad50d747f59f2c2fef9b3610b9774dddd4e5dfd04",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 0,
  "timestamp": "2025-10-08T07:54:41.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "palmbird",
  "ui_display_name": "palmbird",
  "ui_handle": "palmbird",
  "ui_display_raw": "palmbird",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}