manifestablevia treechat·4mo
Replying to #3c10289e
❤️ 9 Likes · ⚡ 0 Tips
{
  "txid": "16f29d67c2dfc30a07ccd8c0089d00b1612c1fd7954e22474ca19b529dae1fb9",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "I hear where you are coming from. Always valuable to stay vigilant especially around subjects that you have a vested interest in so as not to invite vampires through front doors so to speak.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "manifestable",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "3c10289ea886ce8627213a0a265d5358284cf9413468d8e2373ac89b3b6cefc2",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 7,
  "like_count": 9,
  "timestamp": "2025-12-18T18:38:06.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "manifestable",
  "ui_display_name": "manifestable",
  "ui_handle": "manifestable",
  "ui_display_raw": "manifestable",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}
⬇️
manifestablevia treechat·4mo
❤️ 5 Likes · ⚡ 0 Tips
{
  "txid": "b724677cfe3238c663b853073bc213a3343ca9f0cc6be78517a2beaf85e207f9",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "My belief which I don't see anyone else talking about...is that the pattern pathways which move through this system of varying degrees of multi-scale competency architecture are self-reflective boundary conditions. \r\n\r\nI use the examples of dimensionality all the time in my explanations for this model because I think they're the most basic and straight-forward examples. So if we consider the concept of a 1-dimensional object, in a way, we can consider it as a \"whole\" object, but we can also consider it as a confluence of multiple objects. Those objects are the 1 dimensionality of the object itself combined with the two zero-dimensional boundary conditions which define it. \r\n\r\nMy argument is that the process of evolution is the process by which this object moves between the conditions of either its self or its boundary. So in other words, the first-person perspective moves between these fluidly. And there's no real signal when you're seeing from the view of the boundary vs. the object. It all feels identical to the first-person view. \r\n\r\nThis is symbolized in many of our phrases, \"when it rains, it pours,\" or \"sometimes you eat the bear, sometimes the bear eats you,\" etc. And what ultimately happens is in this process we tend to accept one orientation and reject another. And what equanimity is and the process of integrating these functionalities is the capacity to release our self-identification with the system such that we have the ability to recognize that the conditions do not define the entirety of the model. In other words, the function which the program calls itself is not the program. And calling a false function doesn't equate with the program itself being false, etc. but that these are deeper components of an integrated system and its various views are simply elements of the terrain that it touches. \r\n\r\nIf you think of this religiously, you could imagine it in the context of God's love. Just because God's love EXTENDS to the depths of those suffering in hellish environment, doesn't mean it is defined by or a product of that Hell.\r\n\r\nThat ultimately it is simply the pathways and patterns of self-awareness that guide upwards and outwards into higher and higher degrees of self-intuition and this includes the views as being both the object of interest and also simultaneously AS its boundaries. \r\n\r\nAnd that this is a tried-and-true process basically for the model of self-liberation... and this system itself follows the very geometry of the evoltuion of dimensionality itself including the conditions for the boundaries, i.e. 1-d is bounded by two 0-d points. 2-d objects bounded by 4 1-d lines, etc.\r\n\r\nUpwards to the point of the orientation and integration with the 4th dimensional framework for the existence and the boundary of Self which extends beyond mere material qualifictions in terms of the orthogonality of X, Y and Z coordinate access, but a 4th dimensional orthogonality which itself is a reflection (hence orthogonal) and this births a new set of boundary conditions which themselves are 3dimensional in nature. \r\n\r\nI believe bitcoin is the first example of this in the real world which is beyond theoretical and is actually implemented in practice.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "manifestable",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "16f29d67c2dfc30a07ccd8c0089d00b1612c1fd7954e22474ca19b529dae1fb9",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 5,
  "timestamp": "2025-12-19T21:00:08.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "manifestable",
  "ui_display_name": "manifestable",
  "ui_handle": "manifestable",
  "ui_display_raw": "manifestable",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}
Signed by14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGKAIP!