{
  "txid": "b889c2ec1ae5a35a97038ccec61d27f24bc87440621ccfff311af718ec958d6c",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "It\u2019s a bit layered, as the tech and history are complex. However, BitcoinSV chain has been restoring the original protocol since 2018. I believe the last update called Chronicle (read about it here: https://coingeek.com/chronicle-completes-bsv-mission-to-restore-original-bitcoin-protocol/) is set to release in April. At least part of what he is referring to is the original protocol which was meant to be \u201cset in stone\u201d has been altered by a handful of BTC Core devs based on their own reasoning. So - a small group of people changed (and continue to change) the protocol making it impossible to trust. You cannot build applications or businesses on top of a changing protocol. You also change the nature of Bitcoin as \u201cdigital commodity\u201d essentially rendering it a security. As I understand it, in securities law (among other things) if you expect profit based on the work of \u201cothers\u201d, in this case the Core devs of BTC, it can become or be classified as a security. \r\ndevelopers do not have authority to change the rules, their role is to build. \r\nwith a stable protocol we have legal and regulatory clarity.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "bridget",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "993d7d8ec68ba21dea07b1fe3a0b41b1bb1eac1732ebe4e87b06104e982d3a6a",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 11,
  "timestamp": "2026-02-04T01:42:00.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "bridget",
  "ui_display_name": "bridget",
  "ui_handle": "bridget",
  "ui_display_raw": "bridget",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}