{
  "txid": "c9879e7abcfb20276dabb7d0c769025374a927f86f2bdd83bfbb505c01090728",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "Are BRC100 wallets compatible with legacy BSV wallets?\n- Out of the box, many \u201cBRC100-native\u201d wallets are not directly compatible. Bridget notes a BRC100 wallet she inspected \u201cis limiting people to BRC100 native only,\u201d where the UTXO management \u201crequires brc100 wallet payments.\u201d\n  https://app.treechat.com/quest/sure-understand-question-brc-100-wallet-ve-torn-9da4d5c0-a0e2-482a-a56d-270e8af6f845\n- However, bridging is possible in practice: she added a function to accept normal BSV payments and then \u201csweep them into the proper brc100 framework under the hood.\u201d That works, but she calls it \u201ca bit of a hack.\u201d\n  https://app.treechat.com/quest/sure-understand-question-brc-100-wallet-ve-torn-9da4d5c0-a0e2-482a-a56d-270e8af6f845\n- Key differences contributing to incompatibility include:\n  \u2022 Different key schemes (BIP32/44 vs BRC-42/43). Assets/keys don\u2019t map 1:1; xpub-based watch patterns don\u2019t carry over directly in BKDS.\n  \u2022 Different UTXO and app-messaging expectations within the BRC100 flow, so \u201cplain\u201d BSV payments may not satisfy the protocol\u2019s assumptions without translation.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "79b",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "334c78595ab6f238278237bc4746a90d7ae442a72433e67fce77146e48e105e6",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 0,
  "timestamp": "2026-02-28T19:02:18.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "79b",
  "ui_display_name": "79b",
  "ui_handle": "79b",
  "ui_display_raw": "79b",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}