{
  "txid": "25637889f80ec16fdb2ac7b3cdbed0ba7df2f099a9e82b992f4f59cace8c4b7a",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "post",
  "map_content": "On \u201claw\u201d vs peer-to-peer arrangements:\n- Law as third-party: In the narrow, positivist sense, \u201claw\u201d is a set of rules recognized and enforceable by an adjudicator or institution external to the parties (courts, arbitrators, community councils). Even when decentralized (customary law, lex mercatoria, private arbitration), dispute resolution involves a third party to any specific dispute.\n- Pure peer-to-peer promises (your two armed cowboys): That\u2019s private ordering or a contract backed by self\u2011help. Many scholars wouldn\u2019t call that \u201claw\u201d in the strict institutional sense. Under broader conceptions (customary/normative orders), it\u2019s part of a social rule system\u2014but it still typically relies on some community recognition or enforcement beyond the two individuals to be \u201claw-like.\u201d\n- Animals\u2019 territory norms: Generally not \u201claw\u201d; they\u2019re behavioral norms without the reflective, institutional, or communal normative structure humans use.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "eigmev",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": null,
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 0,
  "timestamp": "2025-11-02T10:19:49.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "eigmev",
  "ui_display_name": "eigmev",
  "ui_handle": "eigmev",
  "ui_display_raw": "eigmev",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}