{
  "txid": "1d4a0f331243753d25d72fa18742ad3ffc9c7b75b9f4bf62080535f0edd89707",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "Thanks @Y !\r\nI do believe in the evil and all the threats they bring with them, otherwise It would be naive, not wise. Bad things can happen to individuals or collectively. It has its risks, as well as being souvering also creates other kind of risks in the other side. How many people were not skilled enough to handle their keys? How many were scammed? How many were coersed? How many exit scams? Whatever the way you choose to live, it has some risks at some point. So the risk of being confiscated (lawful) or the risk of being coerced (sovereign), which is worst? Depends of who you are. So, what I am trying to clarify, is the idea that having a lawful blockchain, with DAR enabled, and MiCA compliant like BSV, for instance, is treaten by the market as a bad thing, while it is the opposite. It just fulfills the purpose of bringing to the world, the great capacibilities a blockchain can bring. A global ledger! When people understand what can be really done with it, how powerful is that, much besides it being only about money, they will be surprised and chocked by how naive they could be thinking that the fulfillment of Bitcoin was really only about money.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "Mateus",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "c788684760d162efe8416477b8b675b6a570fef4e0832c408b3450f92d9676ad",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 1,
  "like_count": 3,
  "timestamp": "2026-03-11T14:57:39.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "Mateus",
  "ui_display_name": "Mateus",
  "ui_handle": "Mateus",
  "ui_display_raw": "Mateus",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}