{
  "txid": "615e2cc00e1e118a33da6e85e7819e834bdced3adb2ec82c9915ebd56087d8b1",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "You remind me ...\r\nWhen Zoide first came on to BSV I was immediately questioning the point of just having some digital image in a device, and @Pac somehow brought to me that therebwas physical art coming along with the collectiins that he had set up.  \r\nSo then i was willing to support art on BSV, and as well like that actually use BSV. And i concider that history in the making, and bought a hand drawn piece of what I call the BSV Zoide dragon. \r\nAnd even though I was gradually coming to dislike (for good reasons) that devil advocate calling herself 1Love, I proceeded as planned with buying a metalic print of her BSV wall. \r\nAnd I also bought a more silly metalic print, which was just a white rabbit that CSW created with AI for something that he was writing. But even that was history 2024 in the making. \r\nFrom this I concluded that NFTs are a good digital tag to sell physical art with. \r\nBut since then I also see this time right now as an era of the early days, from which we can document history on NFTs. But I still think that they should be printed in some way.  And that raises a question; if I sell an NFT that came with physical art shouldn't that piece be sent to the new owner. In my opinion yes. \r\nThere's no point in having just a digital image on a device, or on some platform. Art serves its purpose when it's pressent in our physical world, when its here to tell its story, touch minds, move thoughts, feelings, ideas, or somehow just add something with its pressence. Otherwise, if not physically pressent in the world, especially if it started out as just digital pixels in the first place, then it remains just digital pixels. \r\nWhen it comes to AI, it will take a special idea to make it grow any real Art value. Some special idea that comes to involve real effort and real depth of the human, somehow  even though the tech. made the image/s.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "SmilaZ",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "685737bf2eb28c1fb4cffdb097d17292d047e900f20e8613eb95ab3a120be843",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 3,
  "timestamp": "2026-04-03T00:56:41.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "SmilaZ",
  "ui_display_name": "SmilaZ",
  "ui_handle": "SmilaZ",
  "ui_display_raw": "SmilaZ",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}

{
  "txid": "6ced2049081dd259602dd02d08a449e1777e05e1da6178f9d35b41f16bf16c3b",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "You remind me ...\r\nWhen Zoide first came on to BSV I was immediately questioning the point of just having some digital image in a device, and @Pac somehow brought to me that therebwas physical art coming along with the collectiins that he had set up.  \r\nSo then i was willing to support art on BSV, and as well like that actually use BSV. And i concider that history in the making, and bought a hand drawn piece of what I call the BSV Zoide dragon. \r\nAnd even though I was gradually coming to dislike (for good reasons) that devil advocate calling herself 1Love, I proceeded as planned with buying a metalic print of her BSV wall. \r\nAnd I also bought a more silly metalic print, which was just a white rabbit that CSW created with AI for something that he was writing. But even that was history 2024 in the making. \r\nFrom this I concluded that NFTs are a good digital tag to sell physical art with. \r\nBut since then I also see this time right now as an era of the early days, from which we can document history on NFTs. But I still think that they should be printed in some way.  And that raises a question; if I sell an NFT that came with physical art shouldn't that piece be sent to the new owner. In my opinion yes. \r\nThere's no point in having just a digital image on a device, or on some platform. Art serves its purpose when it's pressent in our physical world, when its here to tell its story, touch minds, move thoughts, feelings, ideas, or somehow just add something with its pressence. Otherwise, if not physically pressent in the world, especially if it started out as just digital pixels in the first place, then it remains just digital pixels. \r\nWhen it comes to AI, it will take a special idea to make it grow any real Art value. Some special idea that comes to involve real effort and real depth of the human, somehow  even though the tech. made the image/s.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "SmilaZ",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "685737bf2eb28c1fb4cffdb097d17292d047e900f20e8613eb95ab3a120be843",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 0,
  "timestamp": "2026-04-03T00:56:41.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "SmilaZ",
  "ui_display_name": "SmilaZ",
  "ui_handle": "SmilaZ",
  "ui_display_raw": "SmilaZ",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}