{
  "txid": "147a0a5f6b6a84cadecc223f5f771e3ca1be5f35720c6bd17b52926275284c33",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "if you don't want to go out to X to see it, here it is:\r\n\r\nThe Mystery of the Anomalous 400 BSV Miner Fee on Block 910550\r\n\r\nSomeone paid a 400+ BSV transaction fee on block 910550.   \r\n\r\nHere's what I found:  \r\n\r\nThe Facts\r\n\r\n+ Transaction had five UTXOs from three separate addresses as inputs  \r\n\r\n+ Output was 1 satoshi locked with just OP_NOP (meaning anyone could spend it)  \r\n\r\n+ That 1 satoshi was later spent using OP_1 as input script (no signatures)  \r\n\r\n+ The spending transaction included an OP_RETURN message: \"see me after class\"  \r\n\r\nMy Theory (for what its worth :))  \r\n\r\nThis looks like an intentional educational demonstration - using the blockchain as a whiteboard to teach Bitcoin script mechanics.   The \"see me after class\" message suggests it was a teaching exercise. Of course, \"expensive\" is relative - if someone had substantial BSV holdings, this fee might be trivial to them.  \r\n\r\nTransaction ID\r\n\r\n6a0d4e3e859ae693f49777fff82a9bb7286c1649dd2c3bc01cd163d6a3018676",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "1QC6bjxvSBdiHqGM48t5RxjTEYW6BX4vu4",
  "display_name": "bridget",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "aa173f381989c192349f27d7388179c2dd5fb4d7ff4be3a3a31b0c663462fb95",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 3,
  "like_count": 17,
  "timestamp": "2025-08-22T15:57:41.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "bridget",
  "ui_display_name": "bridget",
  "ui_handle": "bridget",
  "ui_display_raw": "bridget",
  "ui_signer": "1QC6bjxvSBdiHqGM48t5RxjTEYW6BX4vu4",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}