❤️ 17 Likes · ⚡ 0 Tips
{
"txid": "147a0a5f6b6a84cadecc223f5f771e3ca1be5f35720c6bd17b52926275284c33",
"block_height": 0,
"time": null,
"app": "treechat",
"type": "reply",
"map_content": "if you don't want to go out to X to see it, here it is:\r\n\r\nThe Mystery of the Anomalous 400 BSV Miner Fee on Block 910550\r\n\r\nSomeone paid a 400+ BSV transaction fee on block 910550. \r\n\r\nHere's what I found: \r\n\r\nThe Facts\r\n\r\n+ Transaction had five UTXOs from three separate addresses as inputs \r\n\r\n+ Output was 1 satoshi locked with just OP_NOP (meaning anyone could spend it) \r\n\r\n+ That 1 satoshi was later spent using OP_1 as input script (no signatures) \r\n\r\n+ The spending transaction included an OP_RETURN message: \"see me after class\" \r\n\r\nMy Theory (for what its worth :)) \r\n\r\nThis looks like an intentional educational demonstration - using the blockchain as a whiteboard to teach Bitcoin script mechanics. The \"see me after class\" message suggests it was a teaching exercise. Of course, \"expensive\" is relative - if someone had substantial BSV holdings, this fee might be trivial to them. \r\n\r\nTransaction ID\r\n\r\n6a0d4e3e859ae693f49777fff82a9bb7286c1649dd2c3bc01cd163d6a3018676",
"media_type": "text/markdown",
"filename": "|",
"author": "1QC6bjxvSBdiHqGM48t5RxjTEYW6BX4vu4",
"display_name": "bridget",
"channel": null,
"parent_txid": "aa173f381989c192349f27d7388179c2dd5fb4d7ff4be3a3a31b0c663462fb95",
"ref_txid": null,
"tags": null,
"reply_count": 3,
"like_count": 17,
"timestamp": "2025-08-22T15:57:41.000Z",
"media_url": null,
"aip_verified": true,
"has_access": true,
"attachments": [],
"ui_name": "bridget",
"ui_display_name": "bridget",
"ui_handle": "bridget",
"ui_display_raw": "bridget",
"ui_signer": "1QC6bjxvSBdiHqGM48t5RxjTEYW6BX4vu4",
"ref_ui_name": "unknown",
"ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}