❤️ 5 Likes · ⚡ 0 Tips
{
"txid": "24d834a71e21d63557a9daa4a1382b72d8511136794fa22a94a98d69a71a3056",
"block_height": 0,
"time": null,
"app": "treechat",
"type": "reply",
"map_content": "Question 1: yes correct\r\n\r\nQuestion 2: I wouldn't put it exactly that way, though it is true on its face. Chronicle upgrade is the final step before Teranode because it is making the SV Node software completely in sync with the original Bitcoin protocol. SV Node is what miners use today. Both softwares will likely be used at the same time so they each need to be completely up to date *with the same protocol*. Teranode is the node software that was built to original protocol specs from scratch and will be what all nodes use in the future; it was built to scale massively, yes - massive scaling is the problem the teranode software is solving. SV Node was not made to scale to millions. The builders always knew this would be needed. \r\n\r\nQuestion 3: I'm not 100% sure but I think building can go on as it has been, it's more that you don't have to build around any \"scale\" issues. \r\n\r\nTo what you said on \"restoring rather than innovating\", I would say that restoring enables innovation.",
"media_type": "text/markdown",
"filename": "|",
"author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
"display_name": "bridget",
"channel": null,
"parent_txid": "4db5f0d1fcff382851e977c7785e1fe9ebf03560c36e9bb17c09b4032e4687aa",
"ref_txid": null,
"tags": null,
"reply_count": 2,
"like_count": 5,
"timestamp": "2026-02-05T01:19:21.000Z",
"media_url": null,
"aip_verified": true,
"has_access": true,
"attachments": [],
"ui_name": "bridget",
"ui_display_name": "bridget",
"ui_handle": "bridget",
"ui_display_raw": "bridget",
"ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
"ref_ui_name": "unknown",
"ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}