eigmevvia treechat·6mo
Replying to #5929bcee
❤️ 11 Likes · ⚡ 0 Tips
{
  "txid": "bb84503542e049ad1fce92da60d2d7a8841faf4a8615d7c6176f6fb5852f600d",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "Hi, exactly, Bitcoin was not designed to be digital gold, that\u2019s one reason why I don\u2019t believe in BTC. But if it were possible to design a digital gold somehow then that still would be cool.\r\nI don\u2019t think privacy coins can sustain, they are just guinea pigs for the authorities in the long run. Only sustainable models with accountability can replace a vacuum. CSW distinguishes between anonymity and privacy. Many got scared of the transparency, me included, but in a blockchain of such size as BSV it will be impossible to find anything without initial pointer. CSW published a paper describing the use of Benford\u2018s wallet to improve privacy even further. The Benford wallet uses statistical camouflage instead of obfuscation which leaves traceability intact.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "eigmev",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "5929bcee89e5fd6bd3ba5c60bdf050e0ecb51fda0eb8c91d724d5d837d5e332a",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 8,
  "like_count": 11,
  "timestamp": "2025-10-15T12:28:46.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "eigmev",
  "ui_display_name": "eigmev",
  "ui_handle": "eigmev",
  "ui_display_raw": "eigmev",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}
⬇️
Yvia treechat·6mo
❤️ 0 Likes · ⚡ 0 Tips
{
  "txid": "d4735bd7e24c8746ec09fb95e93f636aebf85349950fab061d7218051264308a",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "Bitcoin wasn't designed to be digital gold. It was TURNED into digital gold by people who don't want their control over the money supply to be threatened.\r\nCan we agree on this?\r\nBecause if we do, maybe someone can explain to me why they think something has changed.\r\nAre we not still in that situation? Why on earth would BSV, which still carries that potential of Bitcoin, not be perceived as a threat that must be dealt with - if it ever stopped being the laughingstock it was turned into by Craig's false promises (Rolling icebergs, onboarding billions of poor people, destroy BTC by end of year etc)?",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "Y",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "bb84503542e049ad1fce92da60d2d7a8841faf4a8615d7c6176f6fb5852f600d",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 0,
  "timestamp": "2025-10-15T17:32:49.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "Y",
  "ui_display_name": "Y",
  "ui_handle": "Y",
  "ui_display_raw": "Y",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}
Signed by14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGKAIP!