{
  "txid": "29c7fae6506e00ced6c460084b53e9e4593088462e691c2006a36d0999d82a7b",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "I tend to agree.  \r\nHowever, I think that it may be better, if a few things are solved with precedence before mass adoption.  \r\nOwnership based on mere possession is not a good idea in my opinion.  I have nothing against it in principle, but then I would just use it for small casual payments and would never store more than 1000 bucks in this system ever.  \r\nMonero (XMR) is filling that niche already and there are other privacy oriented projects where possession kinda equals ownership.  \r\nFor example: I do not like BTC and I dislike Microstrategys so called \"business model\" even more. If they even have the coins, which is still not verified if I am not mistaken. But lets say everything is alright and they have publicly posted their public key and everybody knows that its Microstrategies address. Now if they get hacked or stolen you can either let MS and all the people suffer their losses or the miners agree on an exemption and give the coins back.  Same could be true for natural disasters, where large areas could be hit by an earthquake and you lose your keys and even your backups at your parents and at your friends house. At mass adoption it could affect millions of people and I am not sure if the mantra \"not ur keys not ur coins\" makes sense over the longterm.  Because if \"possession means ownership\", than the loss of possession results in loss of ownership.  Like stated above, I think there is demand and usecase for a blockchain like this, but we already have Monero or other similar chains.\r\nNot sure about it myself so far.  \r\nBut with regards to adapting anew technology, there will always be losses in translation. I do not like it, but if analog ownership mappings are being converted into the digital realm there probably will be some disputes.  \r\nHaven't looked into it yet, though. Thanks for the input.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "steffenkd",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "1f5ea366bacf0f66f837b2e7280b9422aacf2e96ec6802dcf8a1f780bfdc320d",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 0,
  "timestamp": "2025-10-31T09:36:28.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "steffenkd",
  "ui_display_name": "steffenkd",
  "ui_handle": "steffenkd",
  "ui_display_raw": "steffenkd",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}

{
  "txid": "bb19ba18cee5ef00db543a47cf0b50bdf5b392903f8c6ee3a485230561133ad0",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "I tend to agree.  \r\nHowever, I think that it may be better, if a few things are solved with precedence before mass adoption.  \r\nOwnership based on mere possession is not a good idea in my opinion.  I have nothing against it in principle, but then I would just use it for small casual payments and would never store more than 1000 bucks in this system ever.  \r\nMonero (XMR) is filling that niche already and there are other privacy oriented projects where possession kinda equals ownership.  \r\nFor example: I do not like BTC and I dislike Microstrategys so called \"business model\" even more. If they even have the coins, which is still not verified if I am not mistaken. But lets say everything is alright and they have publicly posted their public key and everybody knows that its Microstrategies address. Now if they get hacked or stolen you can either let MS and all the people suffer their losses or the miners agree on an exemption and give the coins back.  Same could be true for natural disasters, where large areas could be hit by an earthquake and you lose your keys and even your backups at your parents and at your friends house. At mass adoption it could affect millions of people and I am not sure if the mantra \"not ur keys not ur coins\" makes sense over the longterm.  Because if \"possession means ownership\", than the loss of possession results in loss of ownership.  Like stated above, I think there is demand and usecase for a blockchain like this, but we already have Monero or other similar chains.\r\nNot sure about it myself so far.  \r\nBut with regards to adapting anew technology, there will always be losses in translation. I do not like it, but if analog ownership mappings are being converted into the digital realm there probably will be some disputes.  \r\nHaven't looked into it yet, though. Thanks for the input.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "steffenkd",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "1f5ea366bacf0f66f837b2e7280b9422aacf2e96ec6802dcf8a1f780bfdc320d",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 1,
  "like_count": 3,
  "timestamp": "2025-10-31T09:38:28.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "steffenkd",
  "ui_display_name": "steffenkd",
  "ui_handle": "steffenkd",
  "ui_display_raw": "steffenkd",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}

{
  "txid": "61cc2acd797c9ab2dc85eb53d6ac07deb9ebd06832cb38acac5ed2ed39929d90",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "Every month that the real Bicoin (BSV) has no mass adoption is a very bad thing for poor people  i would say even for average people. The world needs BSV p2p for it low fees . Only rich people can affort BTC and it can't be used for high volume transactions.\r\nThe real revolution of new money that wil not lose value years after year lays in BSV.\r\nBut to keep it's value it needs to be used.\r\nIf Bitcoin Satoshi Vision get's no mass adoption we are all f$cked by the elite.\r\nThe only thing BSVers can do is not giving up and fight for a future with money that doesn't makes us poor.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "palmbird",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "1f5ea366bacf0f66f837b2e7280b9422aacf2e96ec6802dcf8a1f780bfdc320d",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 3,
  "timestamp": "2025-10-31T13:23:16.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "palmbird",
  "ui_display_name": "palmbird",
  "ui_handle": "palmbird",
  "ui_display_raw": "palmbird",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}