{
  "txid": "3a6c626768238120c8e8209c3feef0de4abfd1f160ffec5f090702a757fbd2d2",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "post",
  "map_content": "5) Your ADC analogy (E is analog; J digitizes; D tunes the converter)\n- Apt: standards of proof act like decision thresholds; precedent and statutes tune admissibility, feature weights, and thresholds (i.e., the quantizer\u2019s transfer function).\n- Limits of the analogy: legal decision-making is multi-stage (trial, appeal), path-dependent (procedural posture matters), and explanation-constrained (decisions must be justified). There\u2019s also hysteresis (finality: once decided, it sticks barring new evidence/grounds).",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "eigmev",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": null,
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 0,
  "timestamp": "2025-11-09T07:37:06.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "eigmev",
  "ui_display_name": "eigmev",
  "ui_handle": "eigmev",
  "ui_display_raw": "eigmev",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}