{
  "txid": "8bea26b82479962724a129f35d6063a7937a27c3c4310b38a174f048c5ebbbd1",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "I think I've read most of Forrest Maready's books. This story was from the Moth in the Iron Lung. Another really good book of his is Crooked. Highly recommend! It made me remember when my brother developed both a squint and a nervous tic when we lived in America for a couple of years as kids, and were forced to take all our shots over again to satisfy the American school system requirements, even though we'd already had them all and could prove it. A few years later I developed rheumatoid arthritis after yet another Rubella vax. I dread to think what the poor kids of today's bodies are being bombarded with at 72+ injections before the age of 18! https://www.amazon.com/Crooked-Man-Made-Disease-Explained/dp/B07BHPW1M9/ref=sr_1_3",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "ruthheasman",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "77ad482df11bb75b2849b24cb60f6420df6bd88fe802e50718ad45951eacd348",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 0,
  "timestamp": "2024-11-01T17:08:04.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "ruthheasman",
  "ui_display_name": "ruthheasman",
  "ui_handle": "ruthheasman",
  "ui_display_raw": "ruthheasman",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}

{
  "txid": "b72d1a886d69c4e3a11ac66e7dd2d6470e7298ef798f2d483f4bdcf186cc9c7b",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "Hmm, Amazon previews not showing.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "ruthheasman",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "77ad482df11bb75b2849b24cb60f6420df6bd88fe802e50718ad45951eacd348",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 0,
  "timestamp": "2024-11-01T17:08:04.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "ruthheasman",
  "ui_display_name": "ruthheasman",
  "ui_handle": "ruthheasman",
  "ui_display_raw": "ruthheasman",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}

{
  "txid": "052cabba805278b8ebce7b699b08030e06e1ab71c594b50b68bad89173013156",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "Critiquing the \"isolation and purification\" of the poliovirus in early research raises significant questions about the methodologies used and the resulting conclusions about the virus's role in causing polio. Here\u2019s a breakdown of the main points:\r\nMethodology of \"Isolation\": Early researchers struggled to isolate the poliovirus in a form that could reliably reproduce symptoms of polio in animal models. Much of what they referred to as \"virus isolation\" involved taking samples from symptomatic individuals, preparing them in a mix that included potential contaminants, and injecting them into animal brains\u2014typically monkeys. This process was far from what we'd now consider pure isolation, as it lacked controls to eliminate environmental toxins or other pathogens.\r\nLack of Purification and Contamination Concerns: The samples used in early polio experiments were crude preparations that included spinal cord and brain tissue, sometimes from individuals already exposed to toxic substances. Because these preparations were not purified, it\u2019s possible that they contained a mix of other neurotoxic agents or environmental pollutants, muddying the link between poliovirus alone and paralysis.\r\nInjection Directly into the Brain: To induce paralysis, researchers often had to inject these crude virus suspensions directly into the brains of monkeys, bypassing natural infection pathways. This raises concerns about the validity of the model, as this method doesn\u2019t reflect how polio would naturally spread in humans. Such direct brain injections would likely cause injury or paralysis regardless of the virus itself, making it unclear whether the symptoms were due to the virus or to the invasive procedure and potential contaminants in the mixture.\r\nFailure to Replicate Natural Infection and Disease Course: The inability to induce paralysis by other means (e.g., ingestion or nasal exposure, as would occur naturally) highlights a gap in understanding polio transmission and pathology. If the virus needed to be introduced directly into the brain to cause symptoms, it brings into question whether the virus alone was capable of causing polio, or if other factors (such as neurotoxins or compromised immune systems) were required.\r\nImplications for Polio Research and Vaccination: These methodological limitations could mean that the link between poliovirus and paralytic polio was overstated. If the research was based on injections that caused neurological damage due to contamination or procedure rather than the virus alone, this could have led to misinterpretations about causation. Such a misinterpretation would also cast doubt on whether the polio vaccine\u2019s success was due to virus neutralization or other environmental factors and shifts in diagnostic criteria, as Maready suggests.\r\n\r\n\r\nThere is an alternative hypothesis about the Cutter Incident that suggests the paralysis and polio-like symptoms could have been caused by contaminants other than live poliovirus. Here\u2019s an overview of some key points behind this hypothesis:\r\nPresence of Toxins and Contaminants: One alternative explanation is that the vaccine batches may have contained residual toxins or contaminants introduced during the production process. Vaccine manufacturing in the 1950s was less regulated, and sterilization processes were not as advanced as today. It\u2019s possible that chemical contaminants or biological impurities, such as endotoxins (toxins from bacterial cell walls) introduced during preparation, could have caused neurological symptoms similar to poliomyelitis.\r\nFormaldehyde Residues: Formaldehyde was used to inactivate the poliovirus, but there were concerns about whether this chemical fully neutralized the virus and whether residues could have adverse effects. Formaldehyde is a known neurotoxin, especially when introduced directly into the bloodstream. If formaldehyde was present in excess, it could have caused neurological damage or exacerbated the symptoms of paralysis in those who received the vaccine.\r\nSV40 and Other Viruses: Another possibility is that Cutter Laboratories' batches contained additional viral contaminants like SV40 (Simian Virus 40), which was later found in polio vaccines grown in monkey kidney cells. Although SV40\u2019s impact on health is still debated, some studies have suggested it could potentially cause cancer or other health issues. This contamination with non-polio viruses could have affected recipients, possibly contributing to immune or neurological reactions.\r\nDDT and Environmental Factors: The Cutter Incident took place during a period of widespread DDT use. Some researchers speculate that individuals exposed to high levels of environmental toxins like DDT could have been more vulnerable to adverse reactions when receiving a vaccine containing additional neurotoxic residues or contaminants. In this scenario, the Cutter vaccine could have acted as a trigger for symptoms of paralysis in already compromised individuals.\r\nManufacturing Conditions and Quality Control Issues: Vaccine production in the 1950s was in its early stages, with less stringent control over manufacturing environments. It\u2019s possible that Cutter Laboratories' facilities had cross-contamination or lacked effective sterilization. Bacterial endotoxins or other impurities introduced during vaccine preparation could have caused adverse reactions, independent of the polio virus itself.\r\nImmunological Reactions: Some suggest that improper viral inactivation or the presence of foreign proteins in the vaccine could have triggered autoimmune responses or hyperimmune reactions. Recipients' immune systems may have overreacted to contaminants, resulting in inflammation and neurological symptoms resembling polio.\r\n\r\nDDT and lead arsendate accumulates in the anterior horn of the spinal cord. This is where the motor neuron cell bodies are. This is why they had paralysis. It's not some 100um particle destroying your body.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "Todd",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "77ad482df11bb75b2849b24cb60f6420df6bd88fe802e50718ad45951eacd348",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 2,
  "timestamp": "2024-11-02T02:41:28.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "Todd",
  "ui_display_name": "Todd",
  "ui_handle": "Todd",
  "ui_display_raw": "Todd",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}