Todd

{
  "txid": "6c127f571cef0404b578fc373747833a4e14f388601aa970e4e0358851484bfe",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "Glad to see people enjoying it. Be sure to check out the other episodes with Jack Pitts and Dan Robles for some thought provoking discussions.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "Todd",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "d3e8443e69ed9939f16bda4a77a11a9af7ee85900c31fc90b55a720db8a1bb33",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 0,
  "timestamp": "2025-11-08T04:59:28.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "ui_name": "Todd",
  "ui_display_name": "Todd",
  "ui_handle": "Todd",
  "ui_display_raw": "Todd",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}

{
  "txid": "d3e8443e69ed9939f16bda4a77a11a9af7ee85900c31fc90b55a720db8a1bb33",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "post",
  "map_content": "The other day Anil Bharrat and I had Dr Craig Wright join us for a brilliant chat on the Proof of Claim Podcast. \r\n\r\nRegardless of the identity issue, there's still a wealth of intelligence to be gathered by someone who's been working tirelessly to advance the vision of p2p electronic cash for micropayments and data integrity across all verticals. \r\n\r\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ee-UL0HOokg",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "Todd",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": null,
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 3,
  "like_count": 24,
  "timestamp": "2025-11-08T01:09:21.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "ui_name": "Todd",
  "ui_display_name": "Todd",
  "ui_handle": "Todd",
  "ui_display_raw": "Todd",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}

{
  "txid": "9051d56699fdcd3a0fcf3ff399e0a4d5969facc4c39c400572ae36485700add7",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "post",
  "map_content": "The other day Anil Bharrat and I had Dr Craig Wright join us for a brilliant chat on the Proof of Claim Podcast. \r\n\r\nRegardless of the identity issue, there's still a wealth of intelligence to be gathered by someone who's been working tirelessly to advance the vision of p2p electronic cash for micropayments and data integrity across all verticals. \r\n\r\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ee-UL0HOokg",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "Todd",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": null,
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 0,
  "timestamp": "2025-11-08T01:09:21.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "ui_name": "Todd",
  "ui_display_name": "Todd",
  "ui_handle": "Todd",
  "ui_display_raw": "Todd",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}

{
  "txid": "052cabba805278b8ebce7b699b08030e06e1ab71c594b50b68bad89173013156",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "Critiquing the \"isolation and purification\" of the poliovirus in early research raises significant questions about the methodologies used and the resulting conclusions about the virus's role in causing polio. Here\u2019s a breakdown of the main points:\r\nMethodology of \"Isolation\": Early researchers struggled to isolate the poliovirus in a form that could reliably reproduce symptoms of polio in animal models. Much of what they referred to as \"virus isolation\" involved taking samples from symptomatic individuals, preparing them in a mix that included potential contaminants, and injecting them into animal brains\u2014typically monkeys. This process was far from what we'd now consider pure isolation, as it lacked controls to eliminate environmental toxins or other pathogens.\r\nLack of Purification and Contamination Concerns: The samples used in early polio experiments were crude preparations that included spinal cord and brain tissue, sometimes from individuals already exposed to toxic substances. Because these preparations were not purified, it\u2019s possible that they contained a mix of other neurotoxic agents or environmental pollutants, muddying the link between poliovirus alone and paralysis.\r\nInjection Directly into the Brain: To induce paralysis, researchers often had to inject these crude virus suspensions directly into the brains of monkeys, bypassing natural infection pathways. This raises concerns about the validity of the model, as this method doesn\u2019t reflect how polio would naturally spread in humans. Such direct brain injections would likely cause injury or paralysis regardless of the virus itself, making it unclear whether the symptoms were due to the virus or to the invasive procedure and potential contaminants in the mixture.\r\nFailure to Replicate Natural Infection and Disease Course: The inability to induce paralysis by other means (e.g., ingestion or nasal exposure, as would occur naturally) highlights a gap in understanding polio transmission and pathology. If the virus needed to be introduced directly into the brain to cause symptoms, it brings into question whether the virus alone was capable of causing polio, or if other factors (such as neurotoxins or compromised immune systems) were required.\r\nImplications for Polio Research and Vaccination: These methodological limitations could mean that the link between poliovirus and paralytic polio was overstated. If the research was based on injections that caused neurological damage due to contamination or procedure rather than the virus alone, this could have led to misinterpretations about causation. Such a misinterpretation would also cast doubt on whether the polio vaccine\u2019s success was due to virus neutralization or other environmental factors and shifts in diagnostic criteria, as Maready suggests.\r\n\r\n\r\nThere is an alternative hypothesis about the Cutter Incident that suggests the paralysis and polio-like symptoms could have been caused by contaminants other than live poliovirus. Here\u2019s an overview of some key points behind this hypothesis:\r\nPresence of Toxins and Contaminants: One alternative explanation is that the vaccine batches may have contained residual toxins or contaminants introduced during the production process. Vaccine manufacturing in the 1950s was less regulated, and sterilization processes were not as advanced as today. It\u2019s possible that chemical contaminants or biological impurities, such as endotoxins (toxins from bacterial cell walls) introduced during preparation, could have caused neurological symptoms similar to poliomyelitis.\r\nFormaldehyde Residues: Formaldehyde was used to inactivate the poliovirus, but there were concerns about whether this chemical fully neutralized the virus and whether residues could have adverse effects. Formaldehyde is a known neurotoxin, especially when introduced directly into the bloodstream. If formaldehyde was present in excess, it could have caused neurological damage or exacerbated the symptoms of paralysis in those who received the vaccine.\r\nSV40 and Other Viruses: Another possibility is that Cutter Laboratories' batches contained additional viral contaminants like SV40 (Simian Virus 40), which was later found in polio vaccines grown in monkey kidney cells. Although SV40\u2019s impact on health is still debated, some studies have suggested it could potentially cause cancer or other health issues. This contamination with non-polio viruses could have affected recipients, possibly contributing to immune or neurological reactions.\r\nDDT and Environmental Factors: The Cutter Incident took place during a period of widespread DDT use. Some researchers speculate that individuals exposed to high levels of environmental toxins like DDT could have been more vulnerable to adverse reactions when receiving a vaccine containing additional neurotoxic residues or contaminants. In this scenario, the Cutter vaccine could have acted as a trigger for symptoms of paralysis in already compromised individuals.\r\nManufacturing Conditions and Quality Control Issues: Vaccine production in the 1950s was in its early stages, with less stringent control over manufacturing environments. It\u2019s possible that Cutter Laboratories' facilities had cross-contamination or lacked effective sterilization. Bacterial endotoxins or other impurities introduced during vaccine preparation could have caused adverse reactions, independent of the polio virus itself.\r\nImmunological Reactions: Some suggest that improper viral inactivation or the presence of foreign proteins in the vaccine could have triggered autoimmune responses or hyperimmune reactions. Recipients' immune systems may have overreacted to contaminants, resulting in inflammation and neurological symptoms resembling polio.\r\n\r\nDDT and lead arsendate accumulates in the anterior horn of the spinal cord. This is where the motor neuron cell bodies are. This is why they had paralysis. It's not some 100um particle destroying your body.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "Todd",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "77ad482df11bb75b2849b24cb60f6420df6bd88fe802e50718ad45951eacd348",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 2,
  "timestamp": "2024-11-02T02:41:28.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "ui_name": "Todd",
  "ui_display_name": "Todd",
  "ui_handle": "Todd",
  "ui_display_raw": "Todd",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}

{
  "txid": "9bbab7904e8c35b4b26da218fbf08b1d6f7deecf47ae723690d8a374bf4ed753",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "The Moth in the Iron Lung: A Biography of Polio by Forrest Maready explores the history and impact of polio in the 20th century, suggesting that environmental factors, including industrial pollution and pesticide exposure, may have contributed to the polio epidemic and the need for iron lung treatment. Here are some key findings and themes from Maready's work:\r\nEnvironmental Factors and Polio: Maready challenges the conventional belief that polio is purely a viral disease. He argues that environmental factors, especially neurotoxic pesticides like lead arsenate and DDT, could have triggered polio-like paralysis, potentially misattributing various cases to the poliovirus alone.\r\nIron Lung and Respiratory Paralysis: The iron lung, a common treatment during the polio epidemic, was used to support patients with respiratory paralysis. Maready connects this condition to potential neurotoxic effects of pesticides, which can also cause paralysis, questioning whether some cases required the iron lung due to poisoning rather than the poliovirus.\r\nChanging Definitions of Polio: In the 1950s, the clinical definition of polio was altered to require longer periods of paralysis to diagnose, which led to a steep decline in cases labeled as polio. Maready suggests that this redefinition, alongside the effects of DDT bans, helped reduce polio numbers and may have contributed to perceptions of vaccine success.\r\nVaccine Success and Environmental Shifts: Maready argues that while the polio vaccine is credited with eradicating polio, other factors\u2014such as reduced exposure to pesticides and changes in diagnostic criteria\u2014may have played roles in the drop in cases. He raises questions about the role of vaccines in disease decline, suggesting that environmental reforms were also influential.\r\nHistorical Misconceptions and Health Policy: The book explores the cultural and historical context around polio, iron lung treatment, and health policy, suggesting that public fear and misattribution of causes led to treatment practices and policies that didn\u2019t fully address underlying environmental health issues.\r\nMaready\u2019s perspective is controversial, as it reinterprets established polio narratives, advocating for a broader view of disease causation that includes environmental impacts alongside infectious agents.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "Todd",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "8638a76a4460e7bf49590c8273e5ff7ae549564a5e4ded77ce82fbc0374effa2",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 0,
  "timestamp": "2024-11-01T13:56:15.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "ui_name": "Todd",
  "ui_display_name": "Todd",
  "ui_handle": "Todd",
  "ui_display_raw": "Todd",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}

{
  "txid": "0e4620b239e2d661d4785a75b3c033defc55b701db6e1ec34d9618e42b316212",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "reply",
  "map_content": "\"In my experience, discussions are difficult to have because there are three strands of vax skepticism. They all feed off of one another, and people will often switch from one position to another even in the midst of a single conversation. The first strand is associated with pure deniers, or those who think that covid vaccines have either been dangerous or ineffective. The second strand focuses on some narrow cost-benefit question, like say whether it makes sense to give mRNA vaccines to young boys, or kids more generally. Finally, there are the anti-mandate people.\r\nDealing with the pure deniers is simple: they don\u2019t know how to use data, and make arguments that are just wrong. \"\r\n\r\nThere's also the people who say, germ theory doesn't hold water so vaccines are a moot point. This isn't denial, this is actual skepticism. \r\nAre there any other things that a group of people can have been exposed to which could explain the shared presentation rather than a 100um particle? \r\n\r\nIf anyone has read The Invisible Rainbow, many epidemics can be overlaid with development in transmitting radio waves into the ionosphere. What presented as Polio is explainable by lead arsenate and DDT, GRIDS (preHIV/AIDS) could be explained by abuse of Amyl Nitrite, Bubonic plague has dendrochronological and ice core records of the same time indicating a hazardous level of HCN in the atmosphere. \r\n\r\nNo 100um particle has ever been isolated, cultured and purified and then shown to cause the alleged symptoms. Any experiment that claims to have done so is fraught with methodological weaknesses such as not controlling for the toxic medium the alleged \"viruses\" are cultured in. \r\n\r\nThe claims that vaccines reduced measles mortality rate, when they compare 1957 with 1912, rather than 1956 when there had already been a 98% reduction in mortality per 100k between 1912-1956. \r\n\r\nGerm theory is a hoax. It's fear porn to cover for poisoning the population on an industrial scale to keep them perpetually sick and dependent upon pharma products. \r\n\r\n\"According to Revelation 18:23, when Babylon is permanently destroyed near the end of the Tribulation Period, never again will the city be illuminated by the light of a lamp and never again will the voice of groom and bride be heard in it. Two reasons are given for the final and complete destruction of Babylon. First, Babylon will have merchants who will be the great and powerful people of the earth (Rev 18:23; cf. 18:3). These merchants will use their financial wealth to advance their power, interests, and ideas \u2014 if not also influence world affairs. They will, however, be destroyed. Thomas (1995:346-347) notes that the clause introducing the rest of Revelation 18:23 \u2018supplies the reason for the enrichment and noble standing of those trading with Babylon\u2019. The second reason why God will destroy Babylon is because this city will deceive all the nations by her witchcraft (Rev 18:23b; cf. 9:21). The Greek word translated as \u2018witchcraft\u2019 is \u2018pharmakeia\u2019 (whence we derive the word \u2018pharmacy\u2019).\r\n\u2018Pharmakeia\u2019 describes sorcery, magic, and magic arts; it includes the use of drugs of any kind for magical effect (Garland 2004b:75). During Daniel\u2019s 70th\u00a0week, Babylon will not just bewitch a few regions here or a couple of cities there but will deceive\u00a0all\u00a0the nations with her witchcraft (\u2018pharmakeia\u2019). Revelation 18:23 foresees a global misuse of drugs to bewitch and mislead all nations. God will judge these occult practices. To some extent the great merchants of the earth will enrich themselves even further as they profitably partake in this global deception.\"\r\n\r\n\"Rule 92. Mutilation, medical or scientific experiments or any other medical procedure not indicated by the state of health of the person concerned and not consistent with generally accepted medical standards are prohibited.\"\r\n\r\nPushing these jabs out on junk science, a fabricated PCR sequence, uncalibrated \"tests\", no control group is 100% a war crime. The people who were involved in forcing these jabs on people will be charged with war crimes. Yamashita protocols mean just following orders is not a valid defence.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "Todd",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": "2517b46183f1d267fb28623210bea52471263e3bfd55718fbe8f795eff93cc59",
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 3,
  "timestamp": "2024-11-01T13:04:33.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "ui_name": "Todd",
  "ui_display_name": "Todd",
  "ui_handle": "Todd",
  "ui_display_raw": "Todd",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}