{
  "txid": "9f7f0ea8fe8ac1ba7f9caa72a20605cc6658bb27380d1d70f01efa327fb0a477",
  "block_height": 0,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "post",
  "map_content": "Short answer to your direct question: Yes\u2014physical possession is evidence of ownership, not definitive proof. In many systems it creates a rebuttable presumption that the possessor is the owner (especially for movable goods), but it can be overcome by better title (e.g., a bill of sale, registry record, or proof of theft). A few quick nuances:\n- Chattels/personal property: Possession is strong prima facie evidence against everyone except the true owner. A thief generally cannot pass good title (nemo dat), with limited exceptions (e.g., buyer in ordinary course under UCC entrustment rules).\n- Land/real property: Recorded title usually controls. Possession matters for boundary disputes and can ripen into ownership via adverse possession if strict criteria are met.\n- Digital assets: Control (e.g., private keys) shows factual control, but legal ownership can still differ (custody, trusts, agency).",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "eigmev",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": null,
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 0,
  "timestamp": "2025-11-02T10:19:49.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": true,
  "has_access": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "eigmev",
  "ui_display_name": "eigmev",
  "ui_handle": "eigmev",
  "ui_display_raw": "eigmev",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}